As you know, I’m always on the lookout for marketing campaigns that manipulate us into believing a certain narrative, while their real purpose is to sell a product and drive up corporate profits.
This week, I’m introducing Nestlé’s “get women back to work” campaign.
Sit down and take a deep breath…
Nestlé’s campaign to get women back to work is a clear example of how corporate interests shaped infant feeding—and women’s labor, in the 20th century.
***In Summary ***
As more women entered the workforce in the mid-1900s, Nestlé aggressively marketed infant formula as a modern, liberating alternative to breastfeeding, framing it as the solution that allowed women to return to work while still being “good mothers.”
How the campaign worked to manipulate women
Breastfeeding was portrayed as outdated
Nestlé ads suggested formula was scientific, modern, and superior—aligning it with progress, medicine, and women’s independence.
Doctors and hospitals were key targets
The company provided free formula samples in maternity wards and promoted formula through medical professionals, giving it an aura of medical endorsement.
Marketing directly to women
Ads emphasized convenience and freedom: formula feeding meant women could work, socialize, and live “modern” lives without being tied to their babies.
Expansion into the Global South
In many countries, Nestlé used sales representatives dressed as nurses to promote formula, often in places without clean water—leading to serious health consequences. I have even read that they began by offering free formula, just enough to sustain women until their breast milk dried up.
Why it became a scandal
Critics argued that Nestlé’s tactics:
Undermined breastfeeding
Exploited women’s economic pressures
Contributed to infant malnutrition and mortality in low-income regions
This backlash led to the WHO International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (1981)—a direct response to Nestlé’s practices.
The bigger takeaway
Nestlé didn’t just sell formula; it sold a story—that women’s participation in the workforce required replacing traditional caregiving with corporate products.
The reason I research and share these campaigns is that they help us recognize how corporations design narratives to manipulate behavior, and how those changes ultimately drive profit.
Did you know about this campaign? And what are your thoughts?