Testing discussion visibility with non-moderator accounts in a private/hidden subgroup
More tests.
H
To answer your question, I think they now know “safe & effective” is a myth.
I have read through the replies here and while I agree with most, if not all, I think we are missing the point. Aside from apologies (not accepted without proof of change), we need to remember what Social Media actually is - it’s a place to share OPINIONS not necessarily ‘facts’ (therefore why do we need fact checkers?). If people read information on FB (or X, or any other platform) and take it as ‘gospel’ or ‘fact’ then you cannot help them. As others have mentioned, you have to dig deep to find websites like FLCCC.org, YouTube videos like Dr Been and Dr John Campbell, all people who speak ‘fact’ (and sometimes an opinion or two thrown in). If you read something on Social Media, please do not believe it straight away, even if it was posted by your BFF who is highly intelligent, well educated and doesn’t post ‘crap’. Check it out for yourself! Find a reliable source. I don’t read ‘news’ anymore to get my facts - I go to the source, if possible. Let Social Media be a ‘free for all’ to post what they like, ridiculous or otherwise. If anyone thinks we are being ‘protected’ by having ‘fact checkers’ and censorship, they are sadly misguided. Algorithms, fact-checking and censorship are what is forming many peoples’ opinions thanks to social media!