Many of you may already follow Dr. Meryl Nass, who has been at the forefront of medical freedom and transparency in public health. She’s now raising the alarm on a new issue with big implications:
A rider has been quietly added to the Senate Appropriations bill that could give pesticide manufacturers (like Bayer/Monsanto) permanent liability protection—even when their products cause harm.
The trick?
It would block courts from requiring updated safety warnings on pesticide labels. And as Dr. Nass explains, that’s exactly where plaintiffs have been successfully winning cases—by proving that people weren’t adequately warned.
She’s calling on all of us to help amplify this before it’s too late. She’s also preparing talking points to make it easier for individuals and groups to speak out.
Read her full overview here: Let me explain exactly what is going on with Bayer's effort to enact a wide-ranging pesticide liability shield in the US.?
Let Me Explain Exactly What Is Going On…
Discussion Starter:
Should companies be shielded from liability if they avoid updating health warnings?
How do you think this could impact trust, regulation, and long-term public health outcomes?
Let’s talk—your voice and questions matter.
We’ll share Dr. Nass’s talking points as soon as they’re ready.