A Reprieve for America’s Infants

Dr. Varon responds to the HHS revising the childhood vaccine schedule to align with international best practices.

“This is a long-overdue recalibration of the number of vaccines administered to newborns and young children at the very outset of life. Over the past two decades, the childhood vaccine schedule steadily expanded, often with insufficient consideration for cumulative exposure and long-term health outcomes.

In practice, we subjected infants to an aggressive, one-size-fits-all approach, too often turning their earliest days into a series of injections rather than a period of careful, individualized medical judgment.

Today, HHS took a definitive step toward restoring balance, showing a strong willingness to continue questioning status-quo medical assumptions, and instead place the long-term well-being of children ahead of institutional pressures. We believe this marks the beginning of what will be the most consequential year of healthcare reform in modern American history.”

What are your thoughts about the changes?

I am seeing a lot of medical professionals and patients in Oregon that are saying that they are ignoring the new guidelines and sticking with the old recommendations. I’m thinking this is going to follow political values.

It is beyond frustrating that many patients AND DOCTORS, are still so uninformed!

I wonder if there is an activist group of medical professionals and informed citizens who could send public service informative mailouts to neighborhoods whose residents are most likely patients of those DOCTORS.

Those mailouts could read something like this: If your child has received one or more of these vaccines, you would probably like to know about some of their adverse effects. Here is a short list of the most common ones:

Mailouts may not be feasible; but what about colorful hand-delivered fliers that could be delivered door to door by two or more pairs of volunteers, a group of volunteers for each neighborhood? This action would have to be coordinated to occur on the same day, and also be close to the time most working families would be heading home for dinner time, to help assure that they would be seen before opposing pharmaceutical activists could react and sweep up and destroy those fliers, or send out public service broadcasts on radio or TV.

Also arrange to have an independent journalist with a microphone (and the ear of a local broadcaster) to be recording the entire effort and commenting on the responses of those residents, and maybe asking about their concerns about those vaccines. He or she would refer to the listed adverse effects and their established confirmation by the listed research studies. And have as a frequent refrain the question, “Would you want to give your child a vaccine that causes X?” And then if there would be no response, to ask “Well, what about a vaccine that causes Y?” And so forth …

It is a long overdue start to eliminating all so called “vaccines”. Sadly, the industry has financially rewarded (and brainwashed) so many doctors and nurses that it will take decades for a true reckoning to take place. If, by some miracle, the human race survives after decades of medical malpractice, it will be interesting to see how our grandchildren and great grandchildren look back on the monsters who poisoned their parents and grandparents for profit.

What I hope is that it gets moms and dads starting to really question the vaccinations and their doctors that still recommend the old schedule.

Boy, “first do no harm” really has flown out the window with some…

@AaronAF What a brilliant idea! There’d need to be an army of volunteers. There’s that mental block of “I can’t have been wrong” to get past, too. But what an idea. Avoiding injury to millions of children.

@theornerynurse Will there still be so much profit that they’re able to rewrite history positioning themselves as the good guys. I’d start believing in reincarnation just to see the answer to that question.

Thanks for the kind words. I forgot to mention that a companion journalist (accompanied by filming crew) would be simultaneously and relentlessly pursuing one or more of the doctors asking “Aren’t you at all concerned that research-based evidence shows that some of your patients are likely to experience catastrophic reactions to your recommended vaccines?” From the interviewing journalist’s research about the doctors, he would be able to intersect with each doctor as s/he left the office at lunch, or was going to or from a scheduled meeting, or was heading out to the parking lot outside of the clinic. Ideally, in each instance, the doctor would be in the company of some colleagues and/or patients.

@AaronAF Can you imagine the chaos! It’s a great visual. You do feel that you need to create a ‘situation’ that mentally shakes those who are still in thrall, so they have to face their non-thinking.