Spike Protein Detox

Public Forum
21

Any advice for a woman who has had two miscarriages after one course of the Pfizer shot? Are there any limitations to applying the currently recommended spike protein detox protocols for pregnant women?

22

Ah, hschepian, that’s just horrendous. I’m so sorry. My rage at these jabs just reignites immediately.

May I ask which detox protocol you’re following, and then I could pass the question on to one of our docs and hopefully get an answer for you.

Thanks

Greg

23

I’ve just sent the young couple various articles explaining the detox protocols. The young lady has not yet started a detox protocol.

24

I’ve read that dandelion tea is safe during pregnancy

25

GregT, Have you found any further advice/ information / resources?

26

Sad to hear this! Our daughter in law also just had a miscarriage after 1 round of Pfizer shots. They are trying again.. Praying :folded_hands: for a healthy pregnancy !

I may recommend to her, AUG NAC, to see if this helps in anyway

27

Interesting about the sore calf muscles. I TOO have experienced this! I try to stretch them daily… it seems to help,… otherwise they feel tight!

I am having my blood drawn in NOV, Labcorp, to see where my spike protein levels are after 3 months/ 3 x daily of AUG NAC! I will share results here. Ty for all of your information. It is super helpful

28

:+1: Hope the results are positive. Look forward to seeing them.

29

@surf302 I’ve learned some new information about the ear popping. The cause can be MCAS (Mast Cell Activation Syndrome). I was recently diagnosed with this by Dr. Kory’s clinic. As it turns out you can address this with antihistamines.

- Mechanism: Mast cells release histamine and other mediators in the mucosal lining of the ear and nasopharynx. Since mast cells are concentrated in sinus and nasal passages, their activation can extend into the eustachian tube lining, disrupting normal function.

There are two types of antihistamines, H1 blockers and H2 blockers and you can use both, but H1 blockers are the primary go-to:

  • How Antihistamines Work in This Context*

• Histamine blockade: Antihistamines (especially H1 blockers like cetirizine, loratadine, or ketotifen) reduce the effects of histamine released by mast cells in the mucosa of the sinuses, nasopharynx, and middle ear.

• Symptom relief: By dampening histamine activity, they can lessen:

• Ear fullness and pressure

• Pain resembling otitis media

• Itching or burning sensations in the ear canal

• Secondary nasal congestion that worsens eustachian tube drainage

• Indirect benefit: Because the eustachian tubes regulate pressure between the middle ear and nasopharynx, reducing mucosal swelling and secretions helps them function more normally.

30

… also I might add there is a peptide called amlexanox which could potentially be used. In Japan they’ve been using it successfully for more treatments than we have approved in the US. So, it’s a challenge to find someone who is knowledgeable and can prescribe it.

:puzzle_piece: Mechanistic Fit

  • Mast cell stabilizer: Amlexanox inhibits histamine release by raising intracellular cAMP, similar to cromolyn.

  • Broader mediator suppression: It also reduces leukotrienes and pro‑inflammatory cytokines (TNF‑α, IL‑1β, IL‑6), which are implicated in mucosal swelling and congestion around the sinuses and eustachian tubes.

  • Potential benefit: By dampening mast cell activity in the nasopharynx and middle ear mucosa, it could reduce the sterile inflammation that mimics chronic ear infections and causes tube dysfunction.

:key: Comparison to Antihistamines

  • Antihistamines: Block histamine receptors after release; helpful for ear pressure and congestion but limited against other mediators.

  • Amlexanox: Prevents mast cells from releasing histamine and other mediators in the first place, potentially offering broader control.

  • Ketotifen: A hybrid — both antihistamine and mast cell stabilizer — which is why it’s often favored clinically.

:white_check_mark: Summary: Amlexanox could be considered for MCAS‑related eustachian tube inflammation because of its mast cell stabilizing and anti‑inflammatory properties, but this would be off‑label, experimental, and physician‑directed. It’s mechanistically plausible but not yet evidence‑based for ear involvement.